Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterised by low bone mass and architectural deterioration of bone tissue resulting in increased bone fragility. It can be defined:
The risk of developing osteoporosis is related to a person’s bone development and maintenance over their life span. By the age of 20-30 years old, bone mass has reached its peak as influenced by factors such as genetics, diet, calcium intake and exercise levels. Over approximately the next 20 years, bone mass is maintained through equal rates of bone reabsorption and deposition. However, after the age of 40-50, the rate of bone reabsorption accelerates markedly, thereby increasing the risk of developing osteoporosis (1). This is particularly true in post-menopausal females whose diminishing oestrogen levels make them the most vulnerable cohort to osteoporotic fractures (2).
Fractures are associated with significant pain, disability and a poor quality of life (1). Hip fractures carry the most significant burden to the individual and the healthcare system. Hip fractures have been consistently associated with an increased mortality, with the risk of death being greatest acutely following the fracture. Elderly and institutionalised patients appear to be the most vulnerable cohort to hip fractures, demonstrating up to 30% excess mortality (3). Hip fractures are also associated with a loss of independent mobility, increased assistance with activities of daily living and institutionalisation (4). Vertebral fractures have been associated with increased mortality, chronic back pain, kyphosis and loss of self-esteem (2).
With an ageing population, there is an increased number of Australians who are at risk of developing osteoporosis and subsequent fragility fractures. Therefore, there is a strong public health argument to promote bone health to minimise future fracture-related morbidity, mortality and costs (5). The Orthopaedic team is in a unique position to be able to identify, investigate and potentially treat a large subset of patients presenting with new osteoporosis in the form of a fragility fracture. This is often undertaken in conjunction with the Orthogeriatrics team.
The biggest risk factor for osteoporosis is increasing age. However, consider the following other risk factors in the work-up and management of osteoporosis (6):
Non-modifiable |
|
Lifestyle or modifiable |
|
Chronic disease |
|
Medications |
|
Osteoporosis is a silent disease until a symptomatic fracture occurs. The most common osteoporotic fracture sites include the vertebrae, distal radius, surgical neck of humerus and neck of femur (hip). However, because of its systemic nature, large prospective studies have demonstrated that almost all types of fractures are associated with a low bone mineral density (BMD) (4).
When a patient above the age of 65 years presents to the Orthopaedic ward with any of these fractures, it is of utmost importance that we consider their bone health. The following tests should be considered and interpreted in consultation with Orthogeriatrics or Endocrinology (depending on the services available to you):
In addition, if there is a high clinical suspicion of secondary osteoporosis (e.g. multiple fragility fractures in a younger individual) you may be requested to order the following:
A dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is considered the gold standard measure of bone quality. However, in Australia, a DEXA is not required to diagnose and treat someone for osteoporosis if they present with a minimal trauma hip or vertebral crush fracture. You will recall that the DEXA can be interpreted as:
Non-pharmacological measures include the following:
Vitamin D replacement has not been associated with a reduced risk of fragility fractures (7). However, it is important to ensure vitamin D levels are >50nmol/L to minimise the risk of hypocalcaemia associated with antiresorptive therapy.
Most of the daily recommended intake of calcium can be consumed through calcium-rich foods. However, one would consider oral calcium replacement to minimise the risk of hypocalcaemia associated with antiresorptive therapy (especially denosumab).
The cornerstone of osteoporosis treatment is antiresorptive therapy in the form of bisphosphonates or denosumab. Antiresorptive therapy reduces the risk of vertebral and hip fractures by 40-70% and non-vertebral fractures by 20-30% (6). It is a common misnomer that antiresorptive therapy impairs fracture healing. This is not true (8)! Therefore, an active effort must be made to consider antiresorptive therapy during an inpatient admission for minimal trauma hip or vertebral crush fractures.
Limitations to immediately commencing antiresorptive therapy may include if the patient is not dentally fit or vitamin D/calcium replete. In these cases, ensure an adequate handover is completed to the patient’s General Practitioner or rehabilitation services to minimise the risk of treatment being overlooked in the community.
Here is a brief overview of these medications:
Bisphosphonates |
|
Denosumab |
|
Selective oestrogen receptor modulators are only associated with a reduced risk of vertebral fractures and are reserved for those with spinal osteoporosis and a past or family history of breast cancer.
Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of ≥2 fragility fractures whilst on antiresorptive therapy for greater than 12 months (6). Teriparatide may be considered by the Endocrinology team in the setting of severe osteoporosis and failed antiresorptive therapy.